In this discussion back a few months ago, I stated nothing incorrectly.
What has transpired since is that Chuck, et al decided to "clarify" things (read: do a lot of typing of black words (not the blue words...which are the ACTUAL rules) to "influence us" to "see things their way" (of interpreting the rules) by writing this article.
The rules - at least the rules in MY rule book (copyright 2006 version - which are the current version) STILL do not state to mark it "as Chuck feels it should" because it (his way espoused) is NOT an "in effect" rule. That only can come from a new printing of the rules (and then will be in blue
So I wasn't wrong when I stated what I stated (back in May).
And Chuck wasn't correct. He just has the time / power / etc., to influence things to "get done" (regarding rules changes, interpretations, etc. more than I do) as he sees fit.
Whether the new rules that come out state what the "PDGA staff"
If it does, THEN and only then will I comply with that rule "as printed"...for it WILL be a rule (and in print), and not just some article on a web page.
Karl