B Pool rosters

[Dave Hickson]

3

[Pete Charron]

I'm confused by this.. 3 meaning an open door policy or....?

Because I'm in favor of a designated 16 person roster with 4 alternates who have also been identified... Goal being to field as close to a full team as you possibly can for each challenge...

[Dave Hickson]

I'm confused by this.. 3 meaning an open door policy or....?

Because I'm in favor of a designated 16 person roster with 4 alternates who have also been identified... Goal being to field as close to a full team as you possibly can for each challenge...

Yes that's what I meant by 3. I thought Steve was labeling it as that.

[Chris Bolton]

lets see if i read this right of what is being discussed

20 person roster
8 min
16 max


i like this idea to hopefully allow teams to be able to have more people play by making subs.

i am willing to try it out. if all else fails then we go back to how it was for the 2012-2013 season.

i know that team panthorn might not be able to get 20 for a roster....we are at 15 and trying to find a female for our 16th spot

but i like the idea of having subs (it takes care of people who have crazy work schedules, injuries, etc)

[Pete Charron]

lets see if i read this right of what is being discussed

20 person roster
8 min
16 max


i like this idea to hopefully allow teams to be able to have more people play by making subs.

i am willing to try it out. if all else fails then we go back to how it was for the 2012-2013 season.

i know that team panthorn might not be able to get 20 for a roster....we are at 15 and trying to find a female for our 16th spot

but i like the idea of having subs (it takes care of people who have crazy work schedules, injuries, etc)

+1

[Pete Violet]

lets see if i read this right of what is being discussed

20 person roster
8 min
16 max


i like this idea to hopefully allow teams to be able to have more people play by making subs.

i am willing to try it out. if all else fails then we go back to how it was for the 2012-2013 season.

i know that team panthorn might not be able to get 20 for a roster....we are at 15 and trying to find a female for our 16th spot

but i like the idea of having subs (it takes care of people who have crazy work schedules, injuries, etc)

+1

We would be cool with this as well as long as all 20 - 16 plus 4 subs were named - aka ... no open door policy.

[Dave Hickson]

So then it looks as though Buff, WT, Crane, Thorns, and B2B all agree on the "hickson policy".
I'll call it that as it has no label yet. That's 5 of the 11 teams. So 1 more "hickson policy" vote seals the deal. All other teams please speak up.

It's getting close and we gotta know how many spots we gotta fill.

[Pete Charron]

So then it looks as though Buff, WT, Crane, Thorns, and B2B all agree on the "hickson policy".
I'll call it that as it has no label yet. That's 5 of the 11 teams. So 1 more "hickson policy" vote seals the deal. All other teams please speak up.

It's getting close and we gotta know how many spots we gotta fill.

^ Thisss guyyyyy... Hickson this and Hickson that... OOOooooOOOo look at me, I am Dave Hickson and everything I touch turns to gold, follow me into the future NEFA for I have THE PLAN!!!!!

Just playin' brudda.. I dig and the more feedback we get the better.. Let's get this ish settled...

[Steven Dakai]

I think Adam(Dam Team) wanted #3 also. His post was a bit diffuse but he sorta kinda voted for #3.

So can we start making roster moves?

[Dave Hickson]

So then it looks as though Buff, WT, Crane, Thorns, and B2B all agree on the "hickson policy".
I'll call it that as it has no label yet. That's 5 of the 11 teams. So 1 more "hickson policy" vote seals the deal. All other teams please speak up.

It's getting close and we gotta know how many spots we gotta fill.

^ Thisss guyyyyy... Hickson this and Hickson that... OOOooooOOOo look at me, I am Dave Hickson and everything I touch turns to gold, follow me into the future NEFA for I have THE PLAN!!!!!

Just playin' brudda.. I dig and the more feedback we get the better.. Let's get this ish settled...

You said it Pete.

[Pete Violet]

I change my vote if its called hickson anything.

I am confused by one thing - why is it being called choice # 3 - isn't choice #3 the open door policy - bring whoever you want?

That seems different than a roster of 20.

What am I missing?

[Dave Hickson]

That's why I named it the "Hickson policy" to eliminate confusion. Sounds good to me.

[Pete Violet]

OK I reread everything - for lack of a better name - I like it.

- although the pete policy could work too - at least two captains would agree.

[Pete Charron]

- although the pete policy could work too - at least two captains would agree.

+1

[Jason Toothy]

Sorry for jumping in on this so late, I just found this thread.

I'm in favor of 16 players +4 alternates. Thanks.

[Keith Burtt]

so can we call this all set yet? 16 + 4 works for me and its getting down to roster setting time

[Dave Hickson]

Let's do it.

[Chris Bolton]

Sounds good to me. We might not be able to have 20. I will try to find more people. But I like the idea behind 16+4

[Adam Whitten]

Dam Team is okay with 20 breaking it up 16 +4 alternates