hanging fence ruling at flatrock
-
Arty Graustein
- I live here
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:58 pm
- Location: Coggshall Park
Re: hanging fence ruling at flatrock
Tim why did you have to "shart" on this thread by bringing a Titanism to it?
LTD
-
Rob Walker
- I live here
- Posts: 1904
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:36 pm
- NEFA #: 670
- Location: Rolling the wrong way....
- Contact:
Re: hanging fence ruling at flatrock
I believe that the esteemed Mr Franchi has posted this on the fence in question:
802.04 Throwing from a Stance
A player must choose the stance that will result in the least movement of any part of any obstacle that is a permanent or integral part of the course. Once a legal stance is taken, the player may not move an obstacle in any way in order to make room for a throwing motion. It is legal for a player's throwing motion to cause incidental movement of an obstacle.
If in doubt, just follow the rules. If you don't know what the rule is, read the fence.
802.04 Throwing from a Stance
A player must choose the stance that will result in the least movement of any part of any obstacle that is a permanent or integral part of the course. Once a legal stance is taken, the player may not move an obstacle in any way in order to make room for a throwing motion. It is legal for a player's throwing motion to cause incidental movement of an obstacle.
If in doubt, just follow the rules. If you don't know what the rule is, read the fence.
Sometimes I wonder, "Why is that disc getting bigger?". Then it hits me.