Division selection...

[Craig Cutler]

If the event is for fun and camaraderie then there isn't really a problem with offering 10 + divisions with 10 winners. If the event is for competition and true measuring of skills, I would say less divisions are more appropriate.

btw, I think it was a big mistake for the Masters division to start at age 40. 45 is a more reasonable. imo

[Jeff Wiechowski]

Was a ploy to get us on the same card, buddy.

You can, if you put me with your card in the first round. Will MPM will be cool to have AM1 (or MM1) players in the card? Or it is preferred to have separate Open and AM1 in the first round?

I try to keep Pros and Ams separate if possible. Next event you're signed up for I'll make it a point to get you on the same card.

[Patrick Harris]

Was a ploy to get us on the same card, buddy.

You can, if you put me with your card in the first round. Will MPM will be cool to have AM1 (or MM1) players in the card? Or it is preferred to have separate Open and AM1 in the first round?

I try to keep Pros and Ams separate if possible. Next event you're signed up for I'll make it a point to get you on the same card.

Alright, very cool.

I see nothing wrong to have AM1s to play with Pros. It helps AM1s to see if they can able to compete with the Pros and see if they are ready to move up or not. They both play on the same tees anyway.

But on the other hand, it might bother the Pros seeing AM1s making bad drives or putt that influence their game. I can respect that.