Jeff Wiechowski wrote:Now THAT'S more like the Red Wings that I know!!
I probably would have picked the Wings over just about anyone other than Chicago. Nice win by them last night. That is a great offense to keep quiet. Hawks in 6.
Jeff Wiechowski wrote:Now THAT'S more like the Red Wings that I know!!
John Giampapa wrote:Kovo's awfully quiet.
Eric Kevorkian wrote:John Giampapa wrote:Kovo's awfully quiet.
1) I don't come on here that often anymore![]()
2) I already said I hope i'm wrongIf they move on, you better believe i'm picking against them again.
3) Love the fact they are up 3-0, but am still not drinking the kool-aid. They've won some close games but still think this team has serious issues if/when they move on, that they won't be able to get away with against teams like Pittsburgh or Chicago.
4) Ference didn't have a bad year. He started off very poorly, but was arguably one of their best defensemen the final 1-2mos of the season. I'd like to see him stay, but Krug is earning a spot on the roster if he keeps playing at this level. Kid can flat out skate and handles the puck incredibly well!
Eric Kevorkian wrote:and also bad!
They played BAD hockey for majority of the season. Not OK...not mediocre...BAD hockey.
Have they played well this Rangers series? Absolutely! It sounded like last night they put together a full 60-minute performance for the first time in a long time. Was pissed I couldn't watch it.
John Giampapa wrote:Eric Kevorkian wrote:and also bad!
They played BAD hockey for majority of the season. Not OK...not mediocre...BAD hockey.
Have they played well this Rangers series? Absolutely! It sounded like last night they put together a full 60-minute performance for the first time in a long time. Was pissed I couldn't watch it.
Oh you didn't see it? That explains a lot. They were awesome.
I agree they were terrible at the end of the season and at times in the first round, but that's water under the bridge if they continue to play at this level.
Eric Kevorkian wrote:John Giampapa wrote:Eric Kevorkian wrote:and also bad!
They played BAD hockey for majority of the season. Not OK...not mediocre...BAD hockey.
Have they played well this Rangers series? Absolutely! It sounded like last night they put together a full 60-minute performance for the first time in a long time. Was pissed I couldn't watch it.
Oh you didn't see it? That explains a lot. They were awesome.
I agree they were terrible at the end of the season and at times in the first round, but that's water under the bridge if they continue to play at this level.
I listened, and could tell they were playing well. Saw highlights after work. "That explains a lot"One 60-minute effort is not going to change my outlook on the team! Sure it gives reason to be optimistic....that they've shown they can play at that level. Had they played a real solid first round against the Leafs, and followed it up with this stretch, then I might be a little more optimistic about them.
Matt Stroika wrote:Jeff Wiechowski wrote:Now THAT'S more like the Red Wings that I know!!
I probably would have picked the Wings over just about anyone other than Chicago. Nice win by them last night. That is a great offense to keep quiet. Hawks in 6.
Jim Bobka wrote:Tuukka playing a little pee wee hockey last night.....
Chara with a little deja vu from the finals, letting the defender scoot around him.....while Rask coasted around the net.
The crowd should light a fire for them on Saturday.


Jeff LaGrassa wrote:Bruins fans all chant along with the announcer: "HEY PENGUINS! LET'S GET READY TO CRUMBLE"
Bruins fans all chant along with the announcer: "PENGUINS! LET'S GET READY TO CRUMBLE"