2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

LeftyhasRights · Post by **LeftyhasRights** » Fri Jan 14, 2011 2:18 pm

Can Team Challenge be changed to Team Death Match?

Steve Solbo · Post by **Steve Solbo** » Fri Jan 14, 2011 2:26 pm

LeftyhasRights wrote:Can Team Challenge be changed to Team Death Match?

second!

ekap · Post by **ekap** » Fri Jan 14, 2011 3:39 pm

Sounds good, but then we get a rematch against Burgess!

Steve Solbo · Post by **Steve Solbo** » Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:33 pm

ekap wrote:Sounds good, but then we get a rematch against Burgess!

We'd still win. Unless you guys brough weapons.

Mike Murphy · Post by **Mike Murphy** » Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:41 pm

How about combined team weight? Lowest weight wins.

I think I automatically give WT an advantage :lol:

LeftyhasRights · Post by **LeftyhasRights** » Fri Jan 14, 2011 5:21 pm

Yeah no weapons.. :bom:

just re-name it TDM :twisted:

Steve Solbo · Post by **Steve Solbo** » Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:11 pm

Mike Murphy wrote:How about combined team weight? Lowest weight wins.

I think I automatically give WT an advantage

I don't know. Burgess has a bunch of teeny people. I am far and away the heaviest on Burgess @ 250. I have atleast 30 pds on Todd. The next biggest. Everyone else is sub-180 I bet. Also we likely have 5 guys sub 150.

Mike Murphy · Post by **Mike Murphy** » Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:26 pm

Solbo wrote:
Mike Murphy wrote:How about combined team weight? Lowest weight wins.

I think I automatically give WT an advantage

I don't know. Burgess has a bunch of teeny people. I am far and away the heaviest on Burgess @ 250. I have atleast 30 pds on Todd. The next biggest. Everyone else is sub-180 I bet. Also we likely have 5 guys sub 150.

It'd be close.

If we still had Dewey it would be game, set, match :lol:

David Hoey · Post by **David Hoey** » Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:22 am

BURGESS IS THE BEZT AT EVERYTHING!

Eric Kevorkian · Post by **Eric Kevorkian** » Sat Jan 15, 2011 10:28 am

David Hoey wrote:BURGESS IS THE BEZT AT EVERYTHING!

Sean Curcio · Post by **Sean Curcio** » Sat Jan 15, 2011 12:40 pm

Lightweights... :lol:

Next I'll bet you try to say you are "scrappy" too... :wink:

ekap · Post by **ekap** » Sat Jan 15, 2011 1:23 pm

Burgess can't play in the wind!

Mike Murphy · Post by **Mike Murphy** » Sat Jan 15, 2011 2:14 pm

Sean Curcio wrote:Lightweights... Next I'll bet you try to say you are "scrappy" too...

Haha!

Steve Solbo · Post by **Steve Solbo** » Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:00 am

Kovo wrote:
David Hoey wrote:BURGESS IS THE BEZT AT EVERYTHING!

pretty much.

Mike Dussault · Post by **Mike Dussault** » Thu Jan 20, 2011 9:32 am

Titan Bariloni · Post by **Titan Bariloni** » Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:39 pm

lets discuss potential tie breaker situations....

and what is the weight of 4-0 to 4-1

TY

looks like it could be a battle royal at end of season..!

Jeff Wiechowski · Post by **Jeff Wiechowski** » Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:56 pm

Dam Team: 4-0 is 1.00 win %
Tully Rock: 4-1 is .80 win %

Steven Dakai · Post by **Steven Dakai** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:09 am

Titan, There wont be any need for a tiebreaker if you and Maple Hill both win out, or both lose your last match. You beat them head to head, TullyRock will be in the A pool finals and Maple will be top dog in the B pool. So if you guys beat NOHO, your in the A pool, congratulations!!!!!!

Titan Bariloni · Post by **Titan Bariloni** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:12 am

well..what about "IF" Dam team spanks west t and they finish 4-0..has to hold some weight..as JW pointed out..it may hold more..although strength of schedule is totally different between them and us...IMO...

oh and both teams still have to go through NoNo

Jeff Wiechowski · Post by **Jeff Wiechowski** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:14 am

sorry.... forgot to add the team names to my post

Steven Dakai · Post by **Steven Dakai** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:15 am

Wow, didnt see that. They would be in, too f'n funny!!!!! How much will you pay us to throw the match Titan?

Titan Bariloni · Post by **Titan Bariloni** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:26 am

so if maple hill beats woodland valley.....

and dam team wins out

and TR wins last match

then we have

MH 4-1..correct..?
TR 4-1
WV 4-1
Dam 4-0

how would that work..? dam team in then the other 3 play it off..since are head to heads would be WV>TR>MH>WV and dam team no head to head with any of them...or if WV beats MH..then we have

WV 5-0
TR 4-1
Dam 4-0

would it be dam team and TR playing off...I spoke with Tasty he will not play us..he is pissed we played Panthorn instead of them...although IMO..I think we just schedule it for tie breaker purposes ahead of time...

and IMO 4-1 is same as 4-0 in value...

Todd...? lots to think about

Steven Dakai · Post by **Steven Dakai** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:30 am

In Most leagues this is how it would go

4-0 is in, period.
4-1 teams are tied

Tie breakers-
head to head (still tied)
common opponents (still tied)
Strength of schedule (Win pct of teams you beat)
Then finally a playoff

Titan Bariloni · Post by **Titan Bariloni** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:34 am

so WV 5-0 and Dam 4-0 those would be your A pool teams..? IMO Dam teams opponents win % is weak..!

Steven Dakai · Post by **Steven Dakai** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:37 am

But 4-0 would be impressive. And you would be picking finals locale...any Brewery you like brutha!

Titan Bariloni · Post by **Titan Bariloni** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:39 am

no matter..I am excited to see players from this area performing well....!

for us to have in just 2 short years..2 teams competing at a great level..that shows some major growth..!

Jeff Wiechowski · Post by **Jeff Wiechowski** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:42 am

So your idea of putting together a Tully Rock "minor league" team kinda backfired........... :lol:

Titan Bariloni · Post by **Titan Bariloni** » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:43 am

I have said from start..DAM team has real talent..!...your big brother TR would rough you boys up still..settle down..!

Arty Graustein · Post by **Arty Graustein** » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:21 pm

Is it just me or shouldn't all the teams being considered at least have played the same amount of matches to determine overall record?

Titan Bariloni · Post by **Titan Bariloni** » Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:00 am

Arty wrote:Is it just me or shouldn't all the teams being considered at least have played the same amount of matches to determine overall record?

I agree...BUT...there are only so many teams with a bye...I think they all scheduled matches...leaving one odd team...the DAM team nobody to play a 5th match against...I think

so the best they can possibly do is 4-0.....unless I missed a bye team that has not played a bye team..that they could play..that they have not already played....

confusing

so 4-0 must hold some weight..if not more then 4-1...

tough call...glad I don't gotta make it..!

NEFA DISCussion

2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines

Re: 2010-11 Team Challenge Rules/Guidelines