Stew wrote:Sarcasm's good by me Steve.
NASA, after all, called Tully and instigated the fees and rules because we figured out there was a lefty course out there that the finals could be moved to.
All part of a master plan to move the finals to a lefty course--'cause after all, we'd suck if we weren't at Barre Falls.
No big deal Steve. You just came off as a little petty rationalizing our success for us.
Since you are the big cheese next year, my one suggestion would be to reward the regular-season winners a different way than penalizing the field in the finals. When some guys complain that the second round wasn't fun because they felt they were out of it, compare that to Devens and Tolland who most likely felt that way coming into the entire finals.
Perhaps 1st place gets to pick the finals location as long as its not their home field.
And thank you for stepping up to run this next year--not a particularly rewarding volunteer job.
Actually quite to the contrary, if you look back to my first post about my "surprises" or a better word would be "see IT CAN BE DONE, the whole almost climbing out of the basement" was complimenting you guys about your leapfrogging 3 teams, I actually applauded your effort, cuse in a way it proved the current system ALMOST worked.
I say this b/c yes, you guys were so close to winning 2 more challenges during the season. 2 OT losses, however due to those losses you got penalized, BUT, you almost came ALL the way back only losing by 9 overall, but getting 3rd place, next year it's my belief that WILL net your team something, money, prizes etc.
Next year for course location is THIS.
Before the season starts Capt's give me a sealed envelope with a course name in it... that course is knowledge of YOUR team only. The envelopes are sealed until challenges are over, and we open the envelope of the winning team, blam. FINALS Location, this course can not be your home course of course, but can be someone elses... So, seeing as well as NASA shot this year at Barre.. maybe you guys say, well heck.. let's go back..
Next year's "penalty" WILL be tiered. Teams with similar records will start THE SAME. That is a guarentee.
This year for instance
Burgess 0
Buff 0
Wick 0
Mape +1
BLand +1
NASA +2
Tolland +3
Devens +3
Under my system, finals would have looked like this
Buff 231
Burgess 234
NASA 237
Wick 240
Mape 249
Bland 250
Tolland 255
Devens 269
Cash CTP's will likely be out there still, maybe some merch, but likely CTP's.
Also, I plan on trying to incorporate a way to make sure that at finals, you count towards your team score based on paticipation.
i.e. Letting singles players play and have their score count.
b/c frankly, this would not have changed my approach.. sure, harrington is a great player, but to put him out there by his lonesome... and chance a 47-48 out of him, when I can throw Todd out there and hope for the round in the 41-42-43 range... is so much better and smarter.
We are like an ameoba from the primordial soup that used to be the ocean, we are rapidly evolving.
