2009-10 TC FINALS-April 10th-Maple Hill **RESULTS POSTED**

J_Disc · Post by **J_Disc** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:19 pm

Todd Lapham wrote:It's 14 for top 4 teams and 13 for bottom 4 teams...

10 Singles Scores count.
5 doubles Scores count x 2.

OK -- that's good. I thought it was only 5 singles scores and 3 doubles scores, and we'd only get about 8 players.

Todd Lapham · Post by **Todd Lapham** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:10 pm

ditterman wrote:Why does Wick only have 11? we were planning on fielding our full team of 13 for singles and 6 teams of doubles.

-ditterman

Meant Cranbury only has 11, that's what they said anyway. My bad.

Bill Newman · Post by **Bill Newman** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:21 pm

tourny hotel for Friday night?

Steve Solbo · Post by **Steve Solbo** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:23 pm

Billolick wrote:tourny hotel for Friday night?

oooooo. sounds good to me. someone pick one. lets do THIS!

Closest one is probably in Auburn, 15 min away. But this is a good idea...

Todd Lapham · Post by **Todd Lapham** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:47 am

I need a list of players attending from each captain, so I can start on hole assignments. It's going to look like this:

Hole 1:

Maine
Utopia
Burgess
Nasa
Wick
Borderlands

Hole 2:

Captain L
Tolland
Maine
Utopia
Burgess
Nasa

As you can see I'm just going in the order of which each team finished (if they were tied, first letter in alphabet). I'm going to plug in players according to the list provided so the groupings are pretty random.

Thanks.

Matt DeAngelis · Post by **Matt DeAngelis** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:41 am

What is the limit for the teams? We can bring 12 right? Let me know if you need help with anything. Since some teams will not be rolling deep, you may be able to avoid putting a group out on 11 and 12. Do you need a score port?

Bobby Cowperthwait · Post by **Bobby Cowperthwait** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:40 pm

Does anyone know who's starting on hole 1 @ finals, cuz I do?! 8-)

Gabe Miller · Post by **Gabe Miller** » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:16 am

Is there anything figured out for lunch yet?
Do teams need to bring their own stuff?
Seems like there was quite a scramble last year in the food department.
I pounded a partially raw/frozen hamburger just to get something in the stomach.

LeftyhasRights · Post by **LeftyhasRights** » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:27 am

BYOF = no scramble.

Hot dog annies down the road

Clayton Davidson · Post by **Clayton Davidson** » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:29 am

Hot Dog Annies

!!!!

Scott Howard · Post by **Scott Howard** » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:40 am

Weather permitting, could there be a camping option at Maple Friday night? Team Captain Lawrence would supply the beverages

Shawn Mullen · Post by **Shawn Mullen** » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:43 am

What time we teeing off?

Todd Lapham · Post by **Todd Lapham** » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:55 am

We're aiming for a 9:00 start.

Each team is responsible for food for themselves.

Try to bring as many grills as possible. I know we have 3, that people are more than welcome to use.

Whit Cooper · Post by **Whit Cooper** » Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:54 pm

jdisc wrote:
Todd Lapham wrote:It's 14 for top 4 teams and 13 for bottom 4 teams...

10 Singles Scores count.
5 doubles Scores count x 2.

OK -- that's good. I thought it was only 5 singles scores and 3 doubles scores, and we'd only get about 8 players.

i think you count your worst score over and over till you have ten....

correct?

Chris Piaseczny · Post by **Chris Piaseczny** » Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:45 pm

Todd Lapham wrote:It's 14 for top 4 teams and 13 for bottom 4 teams. Making it 6 somes in every group. If a top 4 team doesn't have enough to fill their slots the next team in line will get to add someone. Basically everyone is going to play as Wick has 11, Burgess and Utopia only 12.

Does that mean NASA and B-land can play all 14 players?

chris p

Bobby Cowperthwait · Post by **Bobby Cowperthwait** » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:52 pm

Todd

I thought is was 14 for top 4 teams

12 for the bottom 4 teams

changing rules again.....

makes no sense to bring an odd number.

Too many people

Steve Solbo · Post by **Steve Solbo** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:03 am

I'd rather limit the number as close to 90 as possible. But it's up to Todd...

ekap · Post by **ekap** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:22 am

AS close to 90 as possible sounds good, but lets not shut out 4 or 5 players total to get under.

Eric Kevorkian · Post by **Eric Kevorkian** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:17 am

ekap wrote:AS close to 90 as possible sounds good, but lets not shut out 4 or 5 players total to get under.

Agreed. People played all year to try to make the finals and it would really suck to have to force people to sit during the culmination of what's been a really fun winter. Especially having to sit at Maple Hill...one of the finest courses in the region.

Bobby Cowperthwait · Post by **Bobby Cowperthwait** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:31 am

1. The benefit for doing better during the reg. season is having
a full squad for the top half. Bottom half gets 12... If Todd allows
the bottom half to have more than 12 people, WTF is the point of doing
good during the reg. season??? just cuz some of the top teams wont have there full 14 , doesn't mean the bottom half should get to add any.

Eric Kevorkian · Post by **Eric Kevorkian** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:39 am

I get what you're saying, Bobby. And I know that's the situation. Just voicing my opinion (surprise surprise). Just seems kind of exclusive to sit people when they could be playing.

Ultimately it's not a true "TEAM Challenge" if your full team isn't playing.

Bill Newman · Post by **Bill Newman** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:49 am

Team Capt. Lawrence is ready to go with 13 players

C. Holmgren
S. Howard
S. Healy
J. DeBois
J. Hannigan
J. Gara
J. Polur
B. Newman
D. Coats
M. McEarlin
T. Graves
C. Martin
P. Konkel

Mike Dussault · Post by **Mike Dussault** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:08 am

Oooooo... This is going to be fun! I will volunteer to sit if Bobby wants. I think we are in bottom half.

:roll:

Matt DeAngelis · Post by **Matt DeAngelis** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:14 am

whitmal wrote:
jdisc wrote:
Todd Lapham wrote:It's 14 for top 4 teams and 13 for bottom 4 teams...

10 Singles Scores count.
5 doubles Scores count x 2.

OK -- that's good. I thought it was only 5 singles scores and 3 doubles scores, and we'd only get about 8 players.

i think you count your worst score over and over till you have ten....

correct?

If that's the case, we are only putting 1 person out there on Saturday for singles. They will shoot a 53 and we will just count that 9 other times. Sound good?

John Mucciarone · Post by **John Mucciarone** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:01 am

oh Meow. You are such the fantastic fox! :lol:

NASA has 13 available....awaiting the Lap's decision.

we should use some of the winnings and donate to MH for
allowing us to play and closing the course down for us.

BRING CASH/CHECK FOR THE APO TOO.

ekap · Post by **ekap** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:15 am

bobbyc wrote:1. The benefit for doing better during the reg. season is having
a full squad for the top half. Bottom half gets 12... If Todd allows
the bottom half to have more than 12 people, WTF is the point of doing
good during the reg. season??? just cuz some of the top teams wont have there full 14 , doesn't mean the bottom half should get to add any.

How does letting the player that otherwise would be sitting, play, affect the top teams?

It's only the team challenge.

The 14/12 limits were set up to fit everyone. If everyone fits anyways, the limits are simply punitive.

Todd Lapham · Post by **Todd Lapham** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:55 am

ekap wrote:
How does letting the player that otherwise would be sitting, play, affect the top teams?

It's only the team challenge.

The 14/12 limits were set up to fit everyone. If everyone fits anyways, the limits are simply punitive.

This.

The formula was setup to ensure the top teams would get a more fair share at playing more players. If you chose to not take that advantage that's your choice. We're only bringing 12. Also, you're really only talking about 3 people here. I think it'd be pretty weak to make those 3 guys sit.

No rules were changed. It was made pretty clear that if we played Warwick then everyone could play, I think that was one of your main selling points to convince people to play there.

Todd Lapham · Post by **Todd Lapham** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:05 am

Steve and Tom have been generous enough to close the course and reduce the fee to $2 per person. Please be sure you don't forget to pay this.

Hole assignments:

HOLE 1

D LIBBY
BOBBY C
TODD L
DAN-O
LICK
BIG REDD

HOLE 2

HOLMGREN
BARNETT
MARIELLE
CAHILL
HARRINGTON
JIM WILLS

HOLE 3

NICKEL
PARSLOW
SCOWARD
MULLEN
J DORE
DOME

HOLE 4

DREW AUSTIN
DREW SMITH
WINTROB
KOVO
HEALY
DAN MACK

HOLE 5

KYLE ENMAN
SJUR
JOSH ROGERS
STROIKA
CARREIRI
DUSSAULT

HOLE 6

DEBOIS
CHRIS BUNCE
STANTON
BARD
TROY
MATT THOMAS

HOLE 7

CHIPCHASE
TATRO
J. HANNIGAN
J. ARGIROS
S. MALLAR
MATT JACKSON

HOLE 8

ERIK PLESO
STANDS WITH
CLAYDOG
CHRIS F'N P
J. GARA
N. HOLMES

HOLE 9

KOZAKA
DAVE JONES
BURGESS
JD
LANER
MIKE CARROL

HOLE 10

J. POLUR
E. MAURER
CASS
GREGG T
RALPH D.
JASON POWERS

HOLE 11

HEATHER
RYAN GIRARD
B. NEWMAN
LES SINNOCK
THRELKELD
UTOPIA

HOLE 12

COW
NASA
SHANE P
CHRIS B
D. COATS
DAVE WOLLNER

HOLE 13

JEFF CONANT
JEFF T
ANDY KING
NASA
PJ DAN
J. GRAHAM

HOLE 14

MCEARLIN
ZAK BROWN
ELLSWORTH
MARVIN
DOCTOR
MUCCARIONE

HOLE 15

DITTERMAN
BARDEN
T. GRAVES
D. MOURAD
BEN DUNLAP
MINI COOP

HOLE 16

SARA
RICH REILLY
BIG NIC
EKAP
C. MARTIN
KYLIE HOKE

HOLE 17

BOURFFARD
UTOPIA
SOLBAMA
STEWIE
J BAYER
MEOW

HOLE 18

CAPTAIN
GALLERINI
PAUL BABB
WHIT
KARY
TSERPES

As always, let me know if I made a mistake.

Sandy Redd · Post by **Sandy Redd** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:18 am

Todd the fee isnt coming out of the money?
Per Que?

Also how about them DUKIES

Bill Newman · Post by **Bill Newman** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:24 am

sorry but we are down to 12

P. Konkel is out

Here are our 12 players

C. Holmgren
S. Howard
S. Healy
J. DeBois
J. Hannigan
J. Gara
J. Polur
B. Newman
D. Coats
M. McEarlin
T. Graves
C. Martin

NEFA DISCussion

2009-10 TC FINALS-April 10th-Maple Hill RESULTS POSTED