Page 3 of 7
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:54 pm
by Adam Whitten
I just want to thank everyone for keeping an open mind going into this season. We are getting things done and we appreciate all the work. I think if we tackle each problem then we should be done in a couple weeks and we should be, for the most part, happy!!
Thanks todd and all the captains for keeping this productive.
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:45 pm
by Titan Bariloni
whats gonna be the girl rule this year...must have or penalty..under 900 rated guy player...can teams have 2 girls...do they need to attend 3 events or can they just play whateva and make finals
I think the roster moves need to allow for injuries more...if we have 1 injury we must use both moves..? 1 changeup should be 1 move allowing for 2 injuries..some of us have old guys on team
will roosters for A pool move to 18..? they should
if teams are under roster..and season starts then they pick up..is it a roster move since they were under anyways..?
losing half your team to players moving sux...all at different times....more roster spots could mean shart like players injured and moving doesn't kill a team..
we should be able to list "subs" at start of year so if players move ect ect or can't play someone could fill in w/o having to make a move
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:27 pm
by Todd Lapham
whats gonna be the girl rule this year...must have or penalty..under 900 rated guy player...can teams have 2 girls...do they need to attend 3 events or can they just play whateva and make finals
Yeah you can have as many girls as you want. There will be a (5?)stroke penalty at finals if you don't qualify a woman.
I think the roster moves need to allow for injuries more...if we have 1 injury we must use both moves..? 1 changeup should be 1 move allowing for 2 injuries..some of us have old guys on team
I'm not sure what you mean. Why would one injury count as both moves? You can add two players per year...
will roosters for A pool move to 18..? they should
Negative. We already have to sit a lot of players at finals, which sucks.
if teams are under roster..and season starts then they pick up..is it a roster move since they were under anyways..?
Negative. Filling out the rest of your team doesn't count as a roster move.
losing half your team to players moving sux...all at different times....more roster spots could mean shart like players injured and moving doesn't kill a team..
we should be able to list "subs" at start of year so if players move ect ect or can't play someone could fill in w/o having to make a move
Yeah that's fine I guess. I don't really think there are as many injuries as you think there are, but we aren't a very old team, so I may be underestimating. 2 subs sound good?
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:30 pm
by Todd Lapham
Also, Team Bennett has just withdrawn from the Team Challenge. So we need another A Pool team.
Borderland won the B Pool finals last year and I think that's the fairest/best way to decide.
If anyone disagrees or blands doesn't want to play in the A Pool, please post.
Thanks.
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:01 pm
by Steven Dakai
ok with us
2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:07 pm
by Chris Bolton
Sounds good to us as well
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:41 pm
by Pete Charron
fine with crane.. talented bunch over there at b-lands.. you can have em

Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:53 pm
by Dave Hickson
Yup
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:21 pm
by Pete Violet
I object.....
just kidding Matt

Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:16 am
by Joseph Mason Proud, III
FINE
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 10:08 am
by Matt DeAngelis
Just as long as we don't play burgess again this year.
Will let you know ASAP.
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:23 pm
by Steve Solbo
Matt DeAngelis wrote:Just as long as we don't play burgess again this year.
Will let you know ASAP.
Dont want to lose AGAIN?
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:37 pm
by Keith Burtt
Fine with maple, we need another year to confidently mash in a pool
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:15 am
by Pete Violet
Here is something I would love discussion on... How about a set weekend each month for Team challenge. It would make it a lot easier on captains not having to find out schedules before confering with the other teams captain and try to get a date that 32 people can agree on. I'd prefer to pick a weekend (for example 2nd weekend every month) so everyone could plan accordingly from the start of the season. Thoughts??
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:38 am
by Stephen Ditter
As long as the teams had a choice btw Sat. and Sunday of the designated weekend. That would also allow me to adjust my work schedule to make at least 3 if not all the challenges.
-mange o matic
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:13 am
by Matt DeAngelis
Pete Violet wrote:Here is something I would love discussion on... How about a set weekend each month for Team challenge. It would make it a lot easier on captains not having to find out schedules before confering with the other teams captain and try to get a date that 32 people can agree on. I'd prefer to pick a weekend (for example 2nd weekend every month) so everyone could plan accordingly from the start of the season. Thoughts??
This is a good idea!
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:31 am
by Steven Dakai
Sounds good
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:07 pm
by Keith Burtt
sounds ok to me
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:04 am
by Pete Charron
I dig
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:16 am
by Eric Maurer
Yup
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:33 pm
by Steve Solbo
Matt DeAngelis wrote:Pete Violet wrote:Here is something I would love discussion on... How about a set weekend each month for Team challenge. It would make it a lot easier on captains not having to find out schedules before confering with the other teams captain and try to get a date that 32 people can agree on. I'd prefer to pick a weekend (for example 2nd weekend every month) so everyone could plan accordingly from the start of the season. Thoughts??
This is a good idea!
What happens when a team can't make that certain weekend?
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:45 pm
by Matt DeAngelis
So, you can't field an eight person team that weekend? Forfeiture. Would be unlikely if rosters were expanded. If the date for all challenges is set in stone ahead of time, it gives more notice for people to take work off.
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:11 pm
by Steven Dakai
Agree
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:17 am
by Pete Violet
I have also heard it will be easier for players to commit to ice bowls. By the way I just threw out there the 2nd weekend... is there a particular weekend of the month that people think would work best? - maybe we take into account the tournament/ ice bowl calender?
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:54 pm
by Steven Dakai
Maybe have two dates. 2nd and 4th. in case it rains or snows
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:30 pm
by Steve Solbo
Matt DeAngelis wrote:So, you can't field an eight person team that weekend? Forfeiture. Would be unlikely if rosters were expanded. If the date for all challenges is set in stone ahead of time, it gives more notice for people to take work off.
Dont buy this. Complete crap. People have lives... can't tie everyone down during 1 particular weekend. If you were gonna go to an ice bowl... go to the ice bowl... your team won't miss you...
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 11:38 pm
by Pete Violet
"What happens when a team can't make that certain weekend?"
To quote you Steve - I don't buy this. Complete crap.
Your saying "what if" 12 out of 20 people cannot make a sat or a sun of a particular weekend that they would have known about since the beginning of the season? Really??
I don't buy this. Complete crap.
In this completely rediculous scenario I am sure the 2 teams could probably work it out - however... why not make scheduliing a hellof a lot easier for the majority of the teams who do see the point of it.
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:35 pm
by Chris Bolton
did we decide if the b pool and/or a pool is playing for cash this year?
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:08 am
by Todd Lapham
Negative, we should get on that asap though. It seems the general consensus is no, but I'll post a new topic.
Re: 2011-12 Season discussions
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:21 am
by Titan Bariloni
that looks good in theory..maybe if teams were not bound by it...then again..that would just be what we have now...1 region may have event listed other may not...
we play capt l first week they have warwick event..we have battleof dams/borderland
we both have finals...kinda forces it to one weekend only..the date kinda seems to just fall into place and teams do what they can