That thought has been going in my head for a few days now.Before all that GD snow, David Hoey wrote:In the future, I think I'd love to see I see State vs State where the elitest of the elite who want good competition, get it, and represent their state.
And we still keep Team Challenge where individual courses are represented, each team can choose how competitive they'd like to be... or two divisions for that... sort of a Primer to get ready for your state team, I don't know.
Would like to see the top 15,20 from each state go at it.
Who doesn't want to defend their state?
Top 10-15-20 from each state battle it out very much like our TC now (sooo... most of Utopia for CT
That gets the crème de la crème playing other said crème de la crème.
Now there's something to aspire to, by wanting to play better to play the best.
State Challenge and Team Challenge remain separate.
I think the numbers are there. If this were to ever happen, "Team" Challenge may be able to be the training grounds for getting a chance to play for your state (especially if State teams are yearly tryouts/ratings), while at the same time, defending your home course ( ideally
And I think those 2 "divisions" would sort themselves out as far as how seriously people were taking the league... eventually
It seems to me, that many or most of us fall into 1 of two categories... we either like to Compete at a very high level and play the best (while having fun), or we like to play in mutually engaging competitions (whatever you take that to be) while placing an emphasis on being a good student (while having fun)).
The point is, is that we all want to have fun, it's just that at the same time, we are all striving to have fun and win.
I'd even love to see a C Pool... perhaps some sort of "competition in the AM, sheet-show for the second round kind of competition mentality" Pretty sure that's a few of you out there! haha
So. It's out there...
There would still be a lotta wrinkles to iron out!! And I'm pretty sure somebody would love to run it more than I would
