Potential Divisions

[Todd Lapham]

Take a look and see what you like best: (Obviously if it's the 3 division you would play everyone in your division and 2 inter league matches as well)


A POOL

EAST

1. BENNETT
4. WOODLAND VALLEY
5. WICKHAM
8. TULLYROCK

WEST

2. CRANBURY
3. BURGESS
6. NASA
7. CAPTAIN LAWRENCE

B POOL (SNAKE)

EAST

1. BORDERLAND
4. WEST THOMPSON
5. NOHO
8. DAM TEAM
9. PANTHORN
12. BURGESS II

WEST

2. MAPLE HILL
3. TOLLAND
6. BORDERLAND II
7. BUFF
10. NEWTON HILL
11. CRANE HILL

B POOL (SNAKE)

EAST

1. BORDERLAND
6. BORDERLAND II
7. BUFF
12. BURGESS II

WEST

2. MAPLE HILL
5. NOHO
8. DAM TEAM
11. CRANE HILL

SOUTH

3. TOLLAND
4. WEST THOMPSON
9. PANTHORN
10. NEWTON HILL

B POOL (REGIONAL)

EAST

BORDERLAND
BORDERLAND II
BURGESS II
WEST THOMPSON
BUFF
NEWTON HILL

WEST

PANTHORN
TOLLAND
NOHO
CRANE HILL
MAPLE HILL
DAM TEAM

B POOL (REGIONAL)

EAST

BORDERLAND
BORDERLAND II
BURGESS II
BUFF

WEST

NOHO
CRANE HILL
DAM TEAM
MAPLE HILL

SOUTH

PANTHORN
TOLLAND
WEST THOMPSON
NEWTON HILL

edit: Added bold to make it easier to read.

[Todd Lapham]

Wow, I just noticed that the snake and regional came out to be the same in both the 3 divison setups. Freaky.

[Chris Bolton]

Take a look and see what you like best: (Obviously if it's the 3 division you would play everyone in your division and 2 inter league matches as well)

B POOL (SNAKE)

EAST

1. BORDERLAND
6. BORDERLAND II
7. BUFF
12. BURGESS II

WEST

2. MAPLE HILL
5. NOHO
8. DAM TEAM
11. CRANE HILL

SOUTH

3. TOLLAND
4. WEST THOMPSON
9. PANTHORN
10. NEWTON HILL

I like this one

[Kelly Conroy]

Take a look and see what you like best: (Obviously if it's the 3 division you would play everyone in your division and 2 inter league matches as well)

B POOL (SNAKE)

EAST

1. BORDERLAND
6. BORDERLAND II
7. BUFF
12. BURGESS II

WEST

2. MAPLE HILL
5. NOHO
8. DAM TEAM
11. CRANE HILL

SOUTH

3. TOLLAND
4. WEST THOMPSON
9. PANTHORN
10. NEWTON HILL

I like this one

Ditto

[Titan Bariloni]

with a few switches I like the concept though...

is hylands creating a team..?

or any others that may potentially add a team..?

I think Dam team may go tully/devens..so the east division may not be a spot for them

[Steven Dakai]

It may be helpful if A teams worry about the A pool; the B pool teams should probably butt out of A pool issues.

Too many cooks spoil the soup!

[Todd Lapham]

with a few switches I like the concept though...

is hylands creating a team..?

or any others that may potentially add a team..?

I think Dam team may go tully/devens..so the east division may not be a spot for them

East, West and South are just what I used to label each division. Could just be A, B and C, it doesn't matter where the courses are located.

If new teams join they'd just follow the snake order. The order was based on last years finals results, then for new teams the order in which they signed up.

[Adam Whitten]

Take a look and see what you like best: (Obviously if it's the 3 division you would play everyone in your division and 2 inter league matches as well)

B POOL (SNAKE)

EAST

1. BORDERLAND
6. BORDERLAND II
7. BUFF
12. BURGESS II

WEST

2. MAPLE HILL
5. NOHO
8. DAM TEAM
11. CRANE HILL

SOUTH

3. TOLLAND
4. WEST THOMPSON
9. PANTHORN
10. NEWTON HILL

I like this one

Ditto

I like this one as well.
And yes we will be switching our home course due to both dam courses being unplayable in the Spring but we don't have to worry about what the divisions come to. I think as long as they are set before the year the divisions will be fine.

[Dave Hickson]

I believe there will be a Team Pioneer out of Hylands. What will this do to the divisions.

Edit Never mind I read the thread.

[Brad Ayotte]

i think i like the B pool regional (2 divisions).. with 6 teams in each division you get 5 games oct-march with a possible cross division match.. you could then use the team records (best record chooses opponent) to determine who plays who in the last match in march or matches could be predetermined..

[Steven Dakai]

What teams would be in each division?

[Todd Lapham]

It's in post 1.

[Joseph Mason Proud, III]

so, so much for regionalization?
ow's
H

WEST

CRAN
WICK
CAPTAIN
TULLY/BURGESS


EAST

BENNETT
WOODLAND
NASA
BURGESS/TULLY

[Titan Bariloni]

It may be helpful if A teams worry about the A pool; the B pool teams should probably butt out of A pool issues.

Too many cooks spoil the soup!

with this being 1 league still in essence with teams moving up and down...thresh hold teams should worry about the league as a whole..if steps are being made for a long term structure for future...teams should dissect all the issues..a/b pool before voting...so yes it would seem simple...A pool worry about A pool and B the same...its not though

I know TR may potentially be and up to A down to B so what happens is of value to my team

or keep hashing shart out when an A pool team moves down..or viceversa cuz they didn't pay attention to what was going on in the pool they did not compete in..I say everyone take a deep look..find a good structure and move on to having just great competitive fun

also I would suggest determining who will be responsible for over seeing B pool Finals before season starts...say last place team B pool..or last place A pool..IDK

[Steve Solbo]

so, so much for regionalization?
ow's
H

WEST

CRAN
WICK
CAPTAIN
TULLY/BURGESS


EAST

BENNETT
WOODLAND
NASA
BURGESS/TULLY

A Pool doesn't get regionalized. It gets snaked in order of finish. To allow for balanced schedules.

[Joseph Mason Proud, III]

glad that's settled so funk easy

[Whit Cooper]

Yo,

Change the stupid [bleep] to the sensible [bleep] that Joe posted

WEST

CRAN
WICK
CAPTAIN
TULLY/BURGESS

[Todd Lapham]

It's based on last years finals results so they're both balanced.

You'd play the same schedule anyway, so it really doesn't matter.

[Steve Solbo]

Yo,

Change the stupid [bleep] to the sensible [bleep] that Joe posted

WEST

CRAN
WICK
CAPTAIN
TULLY/BURGESS

Who's speaking? The team that doesnt exist?

Regional unbalances schedules, plus, HOW is Burgess even close to being aligned with Cran? Wick? and Captain? in what world is this sensible?

[Adam Whitten]

I don"t think A Pool should be changed at all. You guys have a system that works well and you should stick to it. I feel with the increasing number in B Pool we will have a tough time with matches and records for our finals if we keep it the same. I think either 4 divisions or 2 seperate division will work. I don't think it has to be as set as everyone is making it out to be just put so divisions up and see where that goes. Top teams move to finals. We can even base the divisions on our finals from last year if that helps. 1st place goes to one division 2 to another and then back and forth from there. New teams get place as they get placed.

Just my .02

[Todd Lapham]

I don't think it has to be as set as everyone is making it out to be just put so divisions up and see where that goes. Top teams move to finals. We can even base the divisions on our finals from last year if that helps. 1st place goes to one division 2 to another and then back and forth from there. New teams get place as they get placed.

Just my .02

That's how it's set up now.

[Pete Violet]

Ok so I guess I am a little bit surprised that people like the snake set-up since so many seemed to be calling for regional.

We have not yet decided what we like yet.

However, just remember (those that wanted to play teams closer) just because the snake looks good to you this year based on last years standings doesn't mean it will next year. I just don't want this to come up every year.

Another words I think when deciding we should vote based on what concept makes the most sense not what gives our team the best chance of getting to finals.

[Brad Ayotte]

the regional seems the best way.. B pool regional imo fits a system for the long term..

[Dave Hickson]

I don't care what is decided. I just want to play.

[Steven Dakai]

Ok so I guess I am a little bit surprised that people like the snake set-up since so many seemed to be calling for regional.

We have not yet decided what we like yet.

However, just remember (those that wanted to play teams closer) just because the snake looks good to you this year based on last years standings doesn't mean it will next year. I just don't want this to come up every year.

Another words I think when deciding we should vote based on what concept makes the most sense not what gives our team the best chance of getting to finals.

very good point!

[James Reinhold]

Ok so I guess I am a little bit surprised that people like the snake set-up since so many seemed to be calling for regional.

We have not yet decided what we like yet.

However, just remember (those that wanted to play teams closer) just because the snake looks good to you this year based on last years standings doesn't mean it will next year. I just don't want this to come up every year.

Another words I think when deciding we should vote based on what concept makes the most sense not what gives our team the best chance of getting to finals.

very good point!

That's my Co-Cap!

[Pete Charron]

Yeah, I agree with Brad, that the regional set up is most likely the best as far as keeping this debate from coming up each year, and having everything run smoothly.

I also agree with Dave and cannot wait to just play

[Joseph Mason Proud, III]

So, A Pool is now (ASSuming we are accepting Bland):

East

Cran
Wick
NASA
Borderland

West

Burgess
Woodland
Captain L
Tully


?

[Todd Lapham]

Correct.

[Joseph Mason Proud, III]

Cool

So, what's next?