NEFA DISCussion

is that really what it says....lol I have never used the "button"

So I have two roster moves left to use.

I have an individual who has already qualified to play B Pool Finals with another team.

Can I take this individual and move him onto my roster - and have him play with US at A Finals?

Wow

Joseph Mason Proud, III wrote:So I have two roster moves left to use.

I have an individual who has already qualified to play B Pool Finals with another team.

Can I take this individual and move him onto my roster - and have him play with US at A Finals?

friZZaks are rubbing off on you.

Joseph Mason Proud, III wrote:So I have two roster moves left to use.

I have an individual who has already qualified to play B Pool Finals with another team.

Can I take this individual and move him onto my roster - and have him play with US at A Finals?

Ummmmm, no. I think it was stated somewhere else that once you play for a team, you can't play for another team in the same season.

can't play for two teams at the same time.................I think..................

ZZ's tried rubbing off on me at Cranbury Classic two years ago while I was trying to sleep...........NOT a nice way to wake up

Are we talking about JJ ?

Maybe

You can't be serious with this claim..... its implied that you have to play 3 challenges with a team to qualify, if this doesn't suffice lets put it to vote amongst captains.

I can't believe it took your fat ass soo long to respond, Mr. Everywhere.

well?

Matt DeAngelis wrote:

Joseph Mason Proud, III wrote:So I have two roster moves left to use.

I have an individual who has already qualified to play B Pool Finals with another team.

Can I take this individual and move him onto my roster - and have him play with US at A Finals?

Ummmmm, no. I think it was stated somewhere else that once you play for a team, you can't play for another team in the same season.

Two people moved from maple to crane this season after playing in at least 1 challenge for maple. I was surprised to see this didnt raise more eyebrows as i thought the rule was as you had stated as well Matt

apparently, ass schlong ass they play three matches for Crane, issscool...........

in my situation, there are not enough matches left to accomplish this..............
so if THEY move, THEY would have to forfeit playing in Finals..........................

Joseph Mason Proud, III wrote:apparently, ass schlong ass they play three matches for Crane, issscool...........

in my situation, there are not enough matches left to accomplish this..............
so if THEY move, THEY would have to forfeit playing in Finals..........................

Watch out Joe is pulling MOVES@!

I interpret this as the regular season standings determine who moves down and up, not finals standings. Is this correct for both pools? There's some talk that for the B pool it's finals standings but that conflicts with what this says. Any clarification would be cool. Thanks.

• The bottom two teams in the A Pool after the regular season get relegated to the B Pool next year.

• The top two teams in the B Pool move up to the A Pool next year.

Daniel Mack wrote:I interpret this as the regular season standings determine who moves down and up, not finals standings. Is this correct for both pools? There's some talk that for the B pool it's finals standings but that conflicts with what this says. Any clarification would be cool. Thanks.

• The bottom two teams in the A Pool after the regular season get relegated to the B Pool next year.

• The top two teams in the B Pool move up to the A Pool next year.

I understand as regular season determines who moves.
I would take it one step further and have finals be the tie breaker for who moves

Matt Buono wrote:I would take it one step further and have finals be the tie breaker for who moves

Agreed.
But the 8 seed should have a chance at upsetting the 1.

Charlie Holmgren wrote:

Matt Buono wrote:I would take it one step further and have finals be the tie breaker for who moves

Agreed.
But the 8 seed should have a chance at upsetting the 1.

2nd! makes for good drama


grrr I hate this new post timeout to post after post...yeah it prevents multi quick post in 1 thread...but what if ya are thread hopper and wanna post in nanother thread you shouldn't have to wait!

do the women have to play in at lest 3 challenges to make the finals?

what if they show up but can't play because of an injury?

Being that most teams can only manage to carry one female player willing to commit to the TC and theres nothing to fall back upon in the event of an injury, I don't think it should adversely affect a team's entire season. If a guy gets injured it's fine, there's 15 more we can deal with it but if the one woman on a team is unavailable to play I don't think it should be an issue, because there's really no possible backup plan in most cases. Thoughts?

I think you're on to something, Mack... if the girl is injured or sick there should be an exception.

Other plans, arrested, hungover, etc... not our problem.

Take it to the captians thread and see what the vote is on it. Thats why we have it.

Jeff laterreur wrote:do the women have to play in at lest 3 challenges to make the finals?

what if they show up but can't play because of an injury?

I might be wrong, but I think the women are exempt from that rule.

can a player still play finals if a injury hinders them playing their final challenge?


Whit

ass long ass they have played in three challenges for their team...

if this injury is preventing them from participating in their third challenge for their team - no, they may not participate in finals

Joseph Mason Proud, III wrote:ass long ass they have played in three challenges for their team...

if this injury is preventing them from participating in their third challenge for their team - no, they may not participate in finals

Lick is 1 mirrrion percent correct!

Whit Cooper wrote:can a player still play finals if a injury hinders them playing their final challenge?


Whit

Whit, just have them play as a doubles partner....and don't let them throw.